Last semester, I
took a section of FYS that focused on filmic portrayals of minorities
throughout history and how these representations affect the ways in which
Americans respond to these different races. I wish I still had the textbook,
because I would love to see the specific chapter on the portrayal of Arabs.
However, since I don’t have access to that information, I want to use the
trailer to Syriana to explore the presence of Orientalism throughout the clip.
In my own
viewing of the trailer, I found concepts of Orientalism throughout each and
every clip. From the start of the clip, the narrator immediately distinguishes
Americans as the victims, as they are “unable to heat their houses,” and must
pay “twenty dollars a gallon” for gasoline. A clip of Matt Damon solidifies
this issue: “[Oil] is running out and ninety percent of it is in the Middle
East.” Viewers immediately correlate the two realities: Americans will be
unable to heat their houses if the Middle East does not provide them their
abundant share of oil. This correlation represents the Middle East as the
enemy; how dare they expect Americans to pay twenty dollars a gallon for
gasoline when they have all that oil! His line that follows—“This is a fight to
the death”—distinguishes the Manichean “us versus them” concept; they are the
enemy that America is fighting.
After portraying
the protagonist and the antagonist—America and the Middle East, respectively—negative
quotes accompany images of the Arab characters in the film: “His money is in a
lot of dark corners,” a quote said while a picture of the son of the Emir
appears on screen; “I want you to take him”—in this case, presumably the man
shown on screen, the son of the Emir—“to a hotel, drug him, put him in the
front of a car, and run a truck into him at fifty miles per hour,” a very
violent quote in reference to an Arab; “You want to know what the business
world thinks of you?”—in this case, the “you” refers, once again, to Arabs—“We
think a hundred years ago you were living out here in tents in the desert
chopping each others’ heads off,” a quote that portrays the Arabs as violent
and barbaric; “It is illegal to offer gifts, money, or anything of value to
influence foreign officials,” in this case, the foreign official refers to the
new Emir, who apparently, through viewer correlation, would accept these gifts
despite the corruptness and illegality of the act; additionally, a clip flashes
across the screen of George Clooney while he gets kidnapped and tortured by
Arabs.
The final image
of the trailer lists a series of concepts in the film: oil, CIA, lie, Syriana,
die, win, oil.” This list gives the viewer an indirect correlation between
these negative concepts and the enemy from the beginning of the trailer—the Middle
East.
While all of
these thoughts may not rush through the viewer’s mind when they first see the
trailer, these underlying concepts only reinforce the negative connotation
associated with the Middle East. This trailer reaffirms the presence of
Orientalism in post-9/11 filmic portrayals, a perpetuation of America as the good
guy and the Middle East as the bad guy.
Bethany, this is very astute; my follow-up question would be (or was, in class): does the film belie some of the stereotypes the trailer employs? If so, then, why?
ReplyDeleteIt is truly decent to hear your discourse on particular point here. I excessively concur with your focuses here. continue posting great web journals. Much obliged.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.tshirtsflorida.com